Monday 29 January 2018

NDM 32

Just one in four Britons trust news on social media, finds survey
- The Guardian




It has been credited with everything from democratising news to helping to overthrow dictators but it appears that the love affair with social media may be over.
  • Only 24% of the UK population trust the likes of Twitter, Facebook and Instagram when looking for news and information, a survey has found.
  • At the same time, the survey found there had been a striking 13-point increase in support for traditional media, to 61% – the highest level since 2012.
  • The fear of fake news may explain why 42% said they only skimmed headlines on social media but did not click on the content and also the increase in support for traditional media
  • The Edelman trust barometer, the 18th annual survey, found 64% of 1,050 UK respondents worried that social media companies were not regulated enough, 69% agreed that they did not do enough to prevent bullying and 70% that there was insufficient action to stop illegal or unethical behaviour on networks.
  •  53% of people polled said they worried about being exposed to fake news on social media
  • The Edelman trust barometer, published on Monday, suggests the days when social media was championed as an enabler of citizen journalists and for its role in the Arab Spring have passed.
"Amy Orben, a social media psychologist and lecturer at Oxford University, said: “Social media companies are just experiencing what some of their more traditional rivals experienced at their launch. " I find this interesting as it can relate to newspapers and how they were once not a dying media.


NDM 31

Facebook should be 'regulated like cigarette industry', says tech CEO
- The Guardian


Facebook should be regulated like a cigarette company, because of the addictive and harmful properties of social media, according to Salesforce chief executive Marc Benioff. Technology has addictive qualities just like cigarettes do. Benioff, who founded B2B cloud computing company Salesforce in 1999, suggested that regulation of some form was inevitable for the technology industry.


I agree that it was inevitable for social media to require further regulation than it currently presents. I find it interesting how it is compared to cigarettes and that there are similarities in the sense that they are both addictive and there are different kind of forces trying to get you to do certain things.



Monday 22 January 2018

NDM 30

Apple's Tim Cook: 'I don't want my nephew on a social network'
- The Guardian




This article talks about how Tim Cook doesn't believe that we should overuse social media and that he also doesn't let his nephew use social media. He is admired for his passion to do things other than for profit motive. It also mentions how introducing coding at an early age will help with gender diversity.
  • On Wednesday, Apple announced it would spend $30bn in the US over the next five years, creating 20,000 new jobs, a decision the US president attributed to his tax reforms.
  • (Apple is on track to be the first $1tn firm).
  • Of the reporting in the Paradise Papers, he said: “I think the press is essential to any functioning democracy. I’m a huge believer in it.”
This I think can be seen as a large company that is starting to use their power and influence to advocate issues that are prominent in society in terms of the DACA issue and LGBT rights and also gender inequality. This is refreshing to see.

NDM 29

YouTube's small creators pay price of policy changes after Logan Paul scandal
- The Guardian








This article focuses on the new rules that youtube has set for the creators after the Logan Paul scandal. People who talk about important issues are being flagged for being inappropriate whereas there are youtubers like Logan Paul who post videos of a dead body and doesn't get it taken down until he took it down himself all due to the backlash he received and not the involvement of Youtube. Youtubers like Armsortong has had their ad revenues drop from about $180 a month to as alittle as $30 leading her to give up on monetising her videos.
  • YouTube claimed that 99% of channels that would be demonetized under the new policy were already making less than $100 a year.
I feel like this new policy has brought new and unnecessary problems for the content creators that are trying to build up their channels and maybe even try to make a living out of it. This new policy allows the large channels to stay at the top because they already meet all the requirements that the new policy states. Therefore this raises questions on the democracy of the site and whether it gives other creators a fair chance.

January assessment: Learner response

1) Type up your feedback in full (you do not need to write mark/grade if you do not wish to).
WWW 
- There's definite potential here in the way you cover a range of different ideas and examples. Your pluralism paragraph is excellent - need to reach that standard more consistently

EBI 
- Overall this lacks depth and sophistication. You write a lot of short paragraphs that never offer enough for the higher levels. Look over your last couple of pages - very repetitive in paragraph structure
- Need sharper focus on question: Democracy and participation.
- Lacking theories and examples.

2) Read through the mark scheme (go to the last two pages of the document - Section B New/digital media). Of the six different statements for each level (e.g. A sophisticated and comprehensive essay, showing very good critical autonomy.) write which level you think YOU are currently working at for each one. Explain WHY and, for any that are not Level 4, what you are going to do to improve in that area. 

  • A good essay, showing good critical autonomy. (Level 3)
  • Proficient understanding of new and digital media. (Level 3)
  • Focuses mainly on the question. (Level 2)
  • A basic application of some media debates or issues or theories or wider context (level 1)
  • Evidence of a case study and supported by some examples. (level 1)


3) Look at the Examiners' Report for this particular paper. Read page 10 - Section B New/digital media. How many of the good points or higher level answer examples did you include in your essay? What were they? What could you have added to improve your mark?
To improve my mark I could've added more information using media issues, debates and wider contexts. I could have also included debates on the obstacles of equal participation and democracy including things like the power and control of media organisations. I also need to have more focus on the question and include as many examples from new and digital media.

4) Read through these exemplar A grade essays from previous Media graduates. What do these essays offer that yours does not? Identify THREE things you can take from these essays to improve your own responses in future.

  1. Consistent use of media terminology
  2. Consistent use of key words to help link back to the question throughout
  3. A lot of examples given
  4. Media Theories

5) Write ONE new paragraph for your January assessment essay. Ideally, this should be a section you did not cover in your original essay. This paragraph needs to be comprehensive and meet the criteria for Level 4 of the mark schemeMinimum 300 words.


Globalisation allows for the world to become more accessible and people are enriched by getting to know and understand it better. This also increases choice and the opportunities for people to feel empowered. The fact that we have access to information can allow us to make informed decisions when it comes to things like politics and other issues like the recent Logan Paul scandal which allowed many people from around the world to give their opinion after receiving information. The fact that a major platform like Youtube had to come to a middle ground with the audience, shows that the internet is becoming more of a democratic space and that other peoples voices are being considered and listened to. However, despite the benefits that globalisation brings this can’t be said for equal participation as these benefits are provided by a few major organisation. The fact that smaller companies have little to no hope of staking a claim on the global market as they won’t be able to compete with companies like Google, Facebook, Twitter etc. This could link to the idea of Marxism as a small number of large companies are controlling the wider audiences. We are given the illusion of power which can include the illusion that we have an equal participation in what goes on in the internet.

Identities and the Media: Reading the riots

Read the Media Magazine extended feature on the media coverage of the UK riots (MM38 page 5)

 
1) How did the language and selection of images in the coverage create a particular representation of young people? 
 
The representation of young people was immediately shown as negatively by using language like 'riots' instead of 'protests'. The word riot suggests things like wild and uncontrolled. They newspapers were using dramatic images of 'young thugs' for example the Daily Express calling them 'flaming morons'. Despite the fact that that youth offenders had declined of the years it became the main image of youth.

 
2) Why does David Buckingham mention Owen Jones and his work Chavs: the demonisation of the working class?
He mention Owen Jones' work because it links to the way working class people have been represented he mention show there has been 'a new form of class contempt'. The fact that they have become the object of fear and ridicule, not in just news but other media such as little Britain. Despite the fact that the majority of those convicted were those of middle class people who had respectable jobs.
 
3) What is the typical representation of young people – and teenage boys in particular? What did the 2005 IPSOS/MORI survey find?
40% of newspaper articles featuring young people focused on violence, crime or anti-social behaviour; and that 71% could be described as having a negative tone.
Particularly teenage boys were described negatively with word liked yob, scum, and heartless with a few stories describing them positively but only if they had died. This highlights the unbalanced representation of youth that in the majority of the time do not even have a say in the way they are represented in the media. 
 
4) How can Stanley Cohen’s work on Moral Panic be linked to the coverage of the riots?
His work links to the coverage of the riots as he believed that the media talks up the disturbances into a bigger 'moral panic'. They play a role in 'deviance amplification'. This was done reporting the events and expressing the fear and outrage of a 'respectable society'. This attracts people who may have not though of being involved.
 
5) What elements of the media and popular culture were blamed for the riots?
It was said that what provoked the riots was rap music, violent computer games or reality TV. The fact that rap music promotes hatred and violence for authority (especially police but including parents).
 
6) How was social media blamed for the riots? What was interesting about the discussion of social media when compared to the Arab Spring in 2011?
The rioters were skilled enough to co-ordinate their attacks through social media such as Facebook, Blackberry and twitter. They used social media to incite others to join in as well. However social media was seen as a positive thing when it seem to aid the revolutions that took place in Tunisia, Egypt and Syria.

 
7) The riots generated a huge amount of comment and opinion - both in mainstream and social media. How can the two-step flow theory be linked to the coverage of the riots? 
The two-step flow theory refers to opinion leaders and with this news coverage of this included different peoples account of what happened including politicians, community leaders, media commentators and 'experts'. This can bring attention to the situation if they can provide a simple cause/explanation for it.
 
8) Alternatively, how might media scholars like Henry Jenkins view the 'tsunami' of blogs, forums and social media comments? Do you agree that this shows the democratisation of the media?
They may see as a new way to promote the democratisation of the communication system as it allows people more than before to voice their opinion and let there take on the situation have a effect regardless of how small or big. Its part of the contribution to the noise that is generated. People take to different platforms to do so. I think this does in a way show more of a democratisation of media but not to the extent in which the Big Media' has now been finished as it is still those big organisations that decide what news is given importance whether it be through algorithms or simply the amount of coverage its given.
 
9) What were the right-wing responses to the causes of the riots?
The right-wing responses was leaning towards amoral youth. claiming that youth have become disrespectful and less appreciative and have a lack of 'moral compass'. Max Hastings claimed that "such young people live lives of 'absolute futility'"
Some right-wings believed it was ultimately the parents fault, whilst others thought it was the schools fault for failing to discipline and teaching respect to authority to the children.
 
10) What were the left-wing responses to the causes of the riots?
The left-wing responses were leaning towards inequality and poverty. The causes ranged from the cuts in the youth services and the rising in youth unemployment and also the removal of the education maintenance allowance. Capitalism can be seen as the problem too where politicians can lie and cheat and the people who are rioting are following this example.
 
11) What are your OWN views on the main causes of the riots?
 I think that what sparked the riots was the death of Mark Duggan but I also think the main causes for the riots were more due to the cause of inequality and poverty and the fact that people from the working classes were tired of not being treated fairly and the fact that their voices were always being put aside.
 
12) How can capitalism be blamed for the riots? What media theory (from our new/digital media unit) can this be linked to?
Capitalism can be blamed for this in the sense that we follow the example that is set by the senior and respected figures in society. This can be linked to Marxism and Hegemony in the sense that we follow the status quo.
 
13) Were people involved in the riots given a voice in the media to explain their participation?
At first there was a 'rush to instant judgement'. There were many people giving their opinion. I feel as if there wasn't an opportunity for the people involved in the riots to give their reasoning behind the riots before there was a set negative representation that had circulated around the media.
 
14) In the Guardian website's investigation into the causes of the riots, they did interview rioters themselves. Read this Guardian article from their Reading the Riots academic research project - what causes are outlined by those involved in the disturbances?
  • Opportunism - it seemed that normal rules had been suspended and there was an opportunity to acquire goods and luxury items that they could not afford.
  • Gang members - they played a role in the riots despite the effective four-day truce that was applied to towns and cities across England.
  • BBM - It was found that social media sites were nor exclusively and highly used during the riots but instead, popular at that time, Blackberry phones with the free messaging service BBM was used to organise and plan the riots in advance.
  • Political grievances - People who were rioting were for the injustice they were receiving, social and economic. Also education related issues like tuition fees and EMA.

 
15) What is your own opinion on the riots? Do you have sympathy with those involved or do you believe strong prison sentences are the right approach to prevent such events happening in future?
I think that the riots was an eye opener for how major operations work in the sense that they misinterpret and misrepresent certain things in society that in turn fuel further problems and dissatisfaction. The fact that it was made clear how these organisations think of the working class that could add to the inequality that they face. To an extent I have sympathy with those involved however the approach taken I feel was unnecessary. Burning and looting wasn't the best way in solving the situation. 



Wednesday 17 January 2018

NDM 28

Digital connectivity is a force for social good. Charities must harness it
- The Guardian



This article talks about how different sectors including the charity sector are facing a digital transformation. this 'threatens the civil society' due to things like fake news that have affected referendums and elections. 'connectivity makes the extreme more visible, but it can also amplify the good work of charities.'


Video continue to dominate social media
- charities face enormous challenges in using social media strategically as communication channels.
According to the Global NGO Tech Report, only 32% of non-profit organisations have a written social media strategy.
Messaging and chatbots
- charities can use this as a way to communicate with supporters and vice versa. Platforms like Facebook allow bots at little cost to be designed to be of use.
In Liberia, for example, the bot asked 13,000 young people if their school teachers were exchanging grades for sex. Some 86% said yes, uncovering a widespread problem and prompting Liberia’s education minister to work with Unicef to tackle it.
Engaging mobile
90% of media interactions taking place via a screen, and 38% taking place on a smartphone
According to Reason Digital, charities missed out on an estimated £1.5bn of donations last year due to high bounce rates on mobile devices. People using mobile devices to view a charity website are more likely to leave after visiting one page, compared to users viewing from a desktop.


A social good is a service that benefits the largest number of people in the largest possible way. for example Journalism is considered a social good because it does just that and reaches a large audience. They provide quality news for the audience and it is a way for them to keep informed and up to date with the important things that are going on around them. So digital connectivity can be a social good as it is a way for people to keep up to date with the community and world around them. Therefore charities can benefit from this if they find the best strategy to boost their communication with people.

Tuesday 16 January 2018

NDM 27

Logan Paul: YouTube reprimands star vlogger over Japan 'suicide forest' video
- The Guardian




This article is focused in Logan Paul and Youtube. He released a video the day before the new year that exploits a person who had recently committed suicide. He received backlash soon after the upload and despite going against Youtube guidelines the video was not taken down until Logan himself took it down. He then posted an 'apology' on twitter following with an apology video on his vlog channel after. Youtube as well issued an open letter addressing the issue and apologising for their 'failure to respond to the situation immediately'. As a result of his action he has been taken off the Youtube premium advertisement lineup. and a couple of his individual project related to Youtube Red have been 'postponed' - however not cancelled.
  • "the company apologized for its failure to respond to the controversy earlier, writing: “It’s taken us a long time to respond, but we’ve been listening to everything you’ve been saying. We know that the actions of one creator can affect the entire community, so we’ll have more to share soon on steps we’re taking to ensure a video like this is never circulated again.”"
I think this shows us how social media has changed our attitude to certain things. The fact that many people including social media influencers used their voices to express their disgust towards Logan Pauls actions shows how the media has changed into his more pluiralist platform.



Monday 8 January 2018

NDM News: A case study in News and Social Media


Blog task: Factsheet #134 - Press, Prominence and Persuasion – A Case Study in News and Social Media

1) What does Guardian journalist and academic Emily Bell say has happened to the print news industry on page 1 of the factsheet?
- Emily Bell states that the Daily Mirror attained this status by a combination of three things: 'a strong sense of what role journalism could play in the lives of its audience, great reporting and courageous independent editing, and a thorough knowledge of how to put contemporary technology to the service of journalism.'

2) How do news stories become prominent on social media?
-news stories become more prominent on social media through an algorithm that contains editorial decisions and not by gatekeepers. Its a mathematical selection process that is changing the way people access news.

3) What is EdgeRank and how does it work?
- EdgeRank is an algorithm used by Facebook that decides which stories appear in each user's newsfeed. It works by hiding stories that people are not interested in. So if a story doesn't score well, no one will see it.

4) Why was the unrest in Ferguson, Missouri (after the shooting of Michael Brown) an interesting example of how Facebook's news algorithm works?
- It was an interesting example because it shows how differently the social media websites work. Facebooks algorithm put the ice bucket challenge on top and the Michael Brown story was no where to be seen compared to Twitter where she could see that it was filled with reports. This is an example of how these algorithm change how we receive news.

5) How did the news of Osama Bin Laden's death break?
- Through a tweet posted by Keith Urbahn "So I'm told by a reputable person they have killed Osama Bin Laden. Hot damn"

6) How does news spread on Twitter?
- Urbahn had 1000 followers which wasn't enough to receive immediate global interest however the tweet triggered a rush of reactions, tweets and conversation. It was because of his job title that allowed people to believe and be persuaded by the tweet that allowed it to spread.

7) What is YOUR opinion on editorial control at tech giants like Facebook and Twitter? Are they neutral or should they play an active role (such as blocking and deleting ISIS beheading videos)?
- I feel like being neutral will cause difficulty in the way news is spread through social media sites. With Facebook the type of content that was being spread and seen the most based on the algorithm was the ice bucket challenge because of the fact that it was an interesting way to raise awareness to an issue whilst on the other hand the Michael Brown incident was pushed aside. In this case I think that its a case of one news is more trendy and the other would be considered more serious. People in this generation naturally stay up to date with trends therefore it is difficult for news that would be considered more important to reach the same level of interest. However, if tech giants were to have some control they would be able to decide what news gets shown and how equally the news are shown.

8) Spend some time exploring First Look Media. Is this a realistic future for quality journalism?
- I feel like the idea in which the website was made is interesting however I feel like there is no clear structure with this layout. It looks difficult to understand what exactly is going on. I do not think this would make for quality journalism based on the fact that we have companies like the BBC that report unbiased news and here it almost seems subjective or one sided. Therefore its a question of is this type of journalism used for social good or is it simply just another platform where journalists can report their opinions just like we do using social media sites. This doesn't mean that the site doesn't post news that is their to inform. however, the latest top story is 'Oprah Winfrey for President: Have we all gone bonker?'

9) Read the About page for First Look Media. What are they trying to achieve and do you think they will be successful?
- They are trying to achieve a journalism style that promotes freedom of speech - to question those in power including the government as they please. They also look at entertainment and arts that enrich our culture which they believe is vital for a healthy democracy and a vibrant culture. I think

10) Finally, take a good look at The Intercept. Explain how The Intercept started and list three interesting stories on there from the last 12 months.
- It started after Edward Snowden's Revelations of mass surveillance in 2013. Thus a group of journalist decided to make The Intercept dedicated to fearless, adversarial journalism. They cover things like national security, politics and civil liberties etc.
  1.  An Unusually Deadly Year for Women Journalists Around the World, Report Finds
  2. Facebook Says It Is Deleting Accounts at the Direction of the U.S. and Israeli Governments
  3. Being Black in Trump Country: Dozens of People Arrested for Less Than an Ounce of Weed

Monday 1 January 2018

NDM blog essay: feedback and learner response

NDM essay: learner response

1) Copy and paste the email feedback (WWW/EBI/LR) into your blogpost.


WWW: Your response stays focused on the idea of power in the media which is good to see. The inclusion of Marxist and Pluralist perspectives is excellent and definitely something you need to include in your real exam essay. You have a couple of good examples (Paperchase and Panama Papers in particular) but need much more of these in the next assessment.


EBI: There’s a lot we’ve covered over the last 14 weeks that doesn’t appear in this essay – paywalls, David Simon, Alain de Botton, Clay Shirky etc. In fact, you are seriously lacking in quotes and theories. You may have taken on this essay as an exam practice but I’d much rather you used all the resources at your disposal to write a spectacular essay which then means you simply need to replicate it in an exam situation.

Another area that is really lacking is statistics – there are so many out there that exemplify the changes in consumption and production due to new and digital media. Find them, revise them and use them!

Look over your hegemony paragraph – I think it’s the weakest section of the essay and doesn’t really make sense. This is an area to revise – I would combine it with Alain de Botton’s theory and together you’ll have an extremely strong paragraph for the Marxist perspective.

Essay writing technique is another area to look at. Make sure you are writing sharp topic sentences that clearly link to the question. Use the key words from the question and show the reader clearly where the paragraph is going.


LR: Re-write your hegemony paragraph completely – add Alain de Botton’s theory on the news.

Then, create a list of key revision topics from our new/digital case study work this term based on your essay and feedback above. Revise these topics over Christmas for your January MEST3 Section B assessment.


2) Identify your strongest section. Which part of the case study do you know best - Marxism and Hegemony? Pluralism? The decline in the newspaper industry?
- My strongest sections were the Marxism and Pluralism paragraphs.

3) Identify your weakest section or any missing sections. Which part of the case study do you need to revise - News values? Baudrillard's hyper-reality? Alain de Botton's news as social control? Clay Shirky's news as social good?

- My weakest points were the paragraph on Hegemony as it didn't make sense and it would have been more useful if I had included paragraphs on the other topics that we have studied in order to further improve my essay.

4) Complete the LR task specified in your feedback - usually to re-write a certain section and then create a revision list for the January assessment. Please complete these LR tasks within this blogpost - don't go back and edit your original essay at this point.

LR: Re-write your hegemony paragraph completely – add Alain de Botton’s theory on the news.



It can be argued that we as the audience still do not have much control over what we see nowadays in new and digital media. In term of the Hegemonic view that we do not argue or go against what we are shown as an audience. In relation to news, we are seen as a passive audience as Alain de Botton's view on news claiming that it is 'dumbed down' for the simple reason that they are trying to bring in mass audiences. In a sense this gives the feeling that audience are not active consumers of news and large organisations decide what information they want audiences to receive. However, it can also be argued that audiences are not passive and that they are more involved with news. News nowadays have adapted to the changed that new and digital media brings. Almost 60% of all Twitter users in the UK follow some form of newsbrand content. Therefore this shows that social media sites allow audiences to interact more with news and the fact that amongst newsbrand followers 78% follow more than one handle and may cover a range of brands, specialist areas and specific journalists or columnists shows us they are not a passive audience and that the choose what news and journalist they want to follow.





NDM News: Globalisation and fake news

Fake news: blog tasks

The Guardian & the global problem of fake news

Fake news: an insidious trend that's fast becoming a global problem 
 
1) What similarities do you notice between the different countries outlined in the article and their problems with fake news?

- The different countries outlines in the articles have similar problems related to fake news. They all show that Fake news has immense influence over the internet and is usually use against politicians during the election where a rise of its usage is usually seen. Not only that but it is also seen as a way to attack religious beliefs and portray them in a negative way.

2) Is fake news an inevitable consequence of the "culture of freedom and innovation" that the internet has brought with it? Is there a way to stop it?
I believe that Fake news is an inevitable consequence of the "culture of freedom and innovation". The fact that there are many people with different opinions and those who share the same opinion scan come together and in turn have an effect on what is being spread on the internet to the point that it affects what is being said in news. This is a problem that China has seemed to have found a way to control, by having News outlets not being able to use information posted on social media without prior approval. Also, top official at the administration suggested there should be a database to identify internet users’ true identities so they could be “rewarded and punished”.



New York Times and the creation of fake news


Inside a Fake News Sausage Factory: ‘This Is All About Income’ 


1) Which fake news stories were particularly successful for Beqa Latsabidze, the 22-year-old student in Tbilisi, Georgia, who tried to make money from web articles on Trump? 
- Stories that drove traffic for Beqa Latsabidze were not ones about Hillary Clinton but the ones about Donald Trump that mixed real - and completely fake - news in a stew of anti-Clinton fervour.

2) How much can Facebook and Google be blamed for this global rise in fake news?
- Google and Facebook could be blamed to an extent in the sense that they are major influential sites that are used very regularly and that they aid these phony site directly and indirectly in the sense that every time some sees or clicks an ad. The website owner, in this case Mr. Latsabidze gets paid by Google and Facebook plays a role by driving traffic to those kinds of websites.

NDM case study Task 1: Media Magazine research

The first research task for your New/Digital Media independent case study is to use the Media Magazine archive. This is an invaluable re...